oramagugl.blogg.se

Pref setter incognito
Pref setter incognito






pref setter incognito
  1. #PREF SETTER INCOGNITO UPDATE#
  2. #PREF SETTER INCOGNITO CODE#

There are degrees of this, in C# there are three degrees possible:Īll of a class' instance field's are readonly, hence even private code can't alter it. This ensures that a class' invariant is kept, which means the rules describing the valid set of states it can be in are never broken (constructors also help by making sure it starts in such a valid state).Īs for your last question, to be immutable means that a class has no public, protected or internal setters and no public, protected or internal methods that change any fields. Start with a default of every field being private (and for that matter readonly) and then as necessary add members (whether properties or methods) that alter those fields, and ensure that the object remains valid as they change. They're handy though, so while just syntactic sugar, they're pretty useful.Įncapsulation is a matter not of whether your setters (or getters) are public, private, protected or internal, but a matter of whether they are appropriate. Up until private setters being introduced (actually, what changed with C# 2 is the syntax for having a private setter and a public or protected getter in the same block), we could have a private method to do the work of the private setter, so private setters aren't really necessary. (Actually, due to the way that reflection works and cases such as DataBinder.Eval it can be handy to have a property even when a field would work fine, but that's another matter). This is a good syntactic sugar, though not vital.

pref setter incognito

Properties let us use the same syntax for reading and writing through such methods as we would use to read and write a field.

#PREF SETTER INCOGNITO UPDATE#

In other cases, in other languages, one would have a getter and setter method, something like int getId() to obtain a value and void setId(int val) to update it. They also aren't very interesting in this regard, so enough about them. These cases are though mostly restricted to classes that are mostly "plain old data". In some cases therefore, it's perfectly in keeping with the principle of encapsulation to just expose a field publicly - all possible values for the field are valid with all other possible values of all other fields, and therefore the programmer can actively decide to allow the field to be manipulated freely by outside code. Encapsulation means that the the state of an object only happens through a defined interface, and because of this the class can make sure that this state is always valid and in keeping with the purpose of the class.








Pref setter incognito